Thus, the term democracy best captures the expectation of upholding freedoms when it is prefixed with "liberal".
Liberal democracy is a compromise of two traditions: on the one hand, political power attained through popular participation, and on the other, a restraint of that power, through accountability and the protection of liberties.
Including the term "liberal", derived from the philosophy of classical liberalism, recognises the importance of limiting arbitrary government and guaranteeing specified rights of the individual against encroachment by government.
John Locke, the philosopher and founding father of classical liberalism, argued for widespread liberties based on natural rights. And, these rights were to be outside the reach of the state, hence the need for the private sphere separate from the public sphere.
READ | Analysis: Without a stronger opposition, South Africa's democracy is doomed
The extent of the state and ruling elite's power is thus limited, and subject to institutionalised checks and balances. This makes liberal democracies different from authoritarian political systems.
In the latter, government is "from above", with authority exercised over a population irrespective of whether their consent has been given or not.
Authoritarianism is based on the belief in the wisdom of established leaders; where in the ideas of Plato knowledge should triumph numbers.
The population is considered subjects, required to give unquestioning obedience to the state, as opposed to being citizens of a democratic system who have rights and can engage with the elected authorities.
While recognising the need for both the democratic and liberal, distinguishing between the two helps to better analyse where the problem lies.
The use of elections, as opposed to monarchical succession, military overthrows and violence, as the means to accessing political power has become commonplace. As has adult suffrage.
In 1900, less than 13% of the world's adult population enjoyed the legal right to vote, but by 2019 98% enjoy suffrage (according to V-Dem data). In contemporary politics, there has actually been an increase in electoral democracies, from 17 (10%) in 1972 to 72 (34%) in 2018.
And yet, there is also evidence of a growing divide between the ruling elite and ordinary people, an encroaching into the private sphere, and a disregarding of civil liberties.
In some cases, like Russia, it is blatant, where the country has returned to authoritarianism under the leadership of Vladimir Putin.
In Western nations, it is more subtle.
In Canada's Quebec there is a decline in religious freedom as public servants are barred from wearing symbols of their religion in the workplace.
In the UK and US, there has been a creep in terms of academic freedom and freedom of speech, where, for fear of being ostracised, "cancelled" or no-platformed, academics and others are self-censoring and unwilling to challenge current orthodoxy.
In Germany and Sweden, the private family sphere has been encroached on through laws, which prohibit parents' right to home-school.
READ | Mavuso Msimang: The struggle for democracy and clean government is far from over
On the African continent, it is again different.
The political elite are happy to access power through the electoral mechanism, but are averse to institutional checks on their power once accessed.
In addition, political power is less about representing the public interest than it is about their opportunity to feast at the state trough.
V-Dem, a dataset that measures democracy in its complexity, has noted, unlike the growth in electoral democracies, liberal democracies have declined from their peak of 44 (25%) in 2014 to 39 (22%) in 2018.
Similarly, Freedom House, which measures liberal democracy in terms of political and civil liberties, noted in 2020 a decline in democratic freedoms for the 14th consecutive year.
The decline therefore is less a democratic one than a liberal one - it is freedom that is under threat.